There is only one candidate running for president of the association.
And this is just hilarious: “Several colleagues have explained the reasons behind this, which I do not dispute. e.g. Eminent economists would not run for President if they had to compete.”
And how exactly do those “reasons” get turned into restrictions on entry? And how about these proposals:
I am running as a write in candidate! The top 1% of economists control 99% of the data.
1. Universal Basic Instruments
2. Close P&P loophole
3. 15% min acceptance rate
4. Require FOIAd data be made public
5. Ban macro https://t.co/lNupmNrmID
— Jonathan Eyer (@jonathaneyer) August 1, 2022
More seriously, what would a good economist or political scientist recommend to make this market more competitive?
And c’mon people, you really can’t fool us anymore with this stuff. That said, the sad thing is that almost any likely reform is going to make matters worse rather than better. So perhaps I shouldn’t have written this post at all.